Study: Charters Give Pupils, State More Bang for Buck

Reprinted from:  Carolina Journal News Reports

University of Arkansas researchers also refute claim of cherry-picking students
Jul. 29th, 2014
RALEIGH — A new national study concludes that charter schools in North Carolina and other states uniformly outperform traditional public schools, and have a significantly better return on investment for taxpayers. 

One finding of the report refutes critics who have claimed North Carolina charters cherry-pick the best students from district schools. To the contrary, the report concludes that charter schools serve higher levels of minority, low-income, and special-needs students than their traditional public school counterparts.

http://newswire.uark.edu/articles/24679/research-finds-charter-schools-nationwide-more-cost-effective-produce-greater-roi

“Our main intention was to simply provide a sort of descriptive look at what charter school productivity was like just because no one has ever done this at a national scale,” said Albert Cheng, one of the authors of “The Productivity of Charter Schools,” who researched the report for the School Choice Demonstration Project at the University of Arkansas.

“Our report isn’t really a study of absolute achievement levels, but how much bang do you get for your buck,” Cheng said. “Charter schools are operating more effectively and getting a greater return on investment” for taxpayers despite funding inequities that favor traditional public schools.

The study includes 21 states and the District of Columbia. It is based on numbers from the 2010-11 school year. There are two measures of productivity in the report showing charter schools generated better results than traditional public schools for the amount of money spent.

One is a cost-effectiveness study based on student scores in the National Assessment of Educational Progress. The researchers devised a value measurement showing how many NAEP points were earned for every $1,000 invested in per-pupil spending.

The other is a return-on-investment component, which arrives at an estimate of students’ lifetime earnings potential based on gains in student achievement.

“We find that while charter schools in some states have uneven performance, the average charter in this study outperforms [traditional public schools] on both the cost effectiveness and the ROI measures, overall and for each of the states and the District of Columbia,” the report said.

National cost-effectiveness numbers show that charter school students scored 17 points higher on average in math on the weighted NAEP assessment results than traditional public school students, or 40 percent better in productivity. Charter school students scored 16 points higher in weighted reading assessments, or 41 percent better.

In North Carolina, NAEP-weighted results for cost-effectiveness showed that charter schools outscored traditional public schools by 14 points per every $1,000 invested in both math and reading. That means charters outperformed traditional public schools by 26.38 percent in math, and 27.25 percent in reading.

Terry Stoops, director of research and education studies at the John Locke Foundation, characterized that as “a pretty significant spread.”

Charter schools in all states delivered a greater aggregate return on investment than traditional public schools by a weighted average of 3 percent for a student with one year of charter school education, and 19 percent if half of the K-12 years were spent in a charter school. In North Carolina, the return on investment was 1.31 percent higher for one year, and 9.2 percent higher for 6.5 years.

“This is a significant study mainly because there’s a lot of criticisms, especially during the time the data were taken from, that North Carolina’s charter schools were underperforming, that they weren’t performing as well as traditional public schools” when direct student-to-student performance measurements were used, Stoops said.

“This asks a different question. It’s not just how the kids are performing, it’s how much money are we putting in and what are we getting out, and that’s a very different question than just comparing student performance,” he said.

Complementary reports

The University of Arkansas study complements another recent research report from the liberal Center for American Progress ranking individual school districts’ return on investment, Stoops said.

At the time the University of Arkansas study was done, North Carolina spent $9,999 per-pupil at traditional public schools and $8,277 for charter school students. A separate University of Arkansas study released in April, “Charter School Funding: Inequity Expands,” awarded North Carolina a D for that funding disparity.

“Our research can’t prove that charter schools, if they were to get more money, would maintain their level of productivity. It’s not a slam-dunk case where the implication of this report is to fund charters at a greater level,” Cheng said.

“But definitely there’s considerations of equity and efficiency in terms of how we manage and steward public dollars,” Cheng said. “These are salient issues, and we hope to bring both sets of values into discussions of public funding and public policy.”

Richard Vinroot, a lawyer, former Charlotte mayor, and one of the founders of the Sugar Creek Charter School, said there is “a dramatic, growing gap” between the two education sectors in North Carolina.

Vinroot has been lobbying lawmakers for several years for more charter school funding and believes this latest report bolsters the case. In 2003 the funding differential between charters and traditional schools was just 8 percent. It widened to 17 percent by the time of the study.

“This report’s analysis shows not only that charter schools are outperforming school systems, but in fact charter schools have more free and reduced [price] lunch students — that means poor people, probably — and more special-education children, and more minorities than they do in the [traditional] school system,” Vinroot said.

‘Better job for less money’

“So we’re doing a better job for less money with a more difficult population, bottom line,” Vinroot said. “I hope it means that finally this legislature will begin to understand they need to be fairer to charter schools.”

According to the study, 48.9 percent of North Carolina charter school students were from low-income families eligible for free lunch programs compared to 47.2 percent of traditional public school students. There were 56.8 percent of charter school students eligible for free or reduced-price lunch programs compared to 53.9 percent of traditional school students.

North Carolina charter school student demographics include 8.5 percent in special-education programs compared to 7.5 percent in traditional public schools.

Sugar Creek Charter School’s student population comprises more than 90 percent poor, black children, Vinroot said.

“Almost 90 percent are at grade level compared to maybe 30 or 40 percent of their peers in the [Charlotte-Mecklenburg] school system here, and across the state, and we’re doing it with 70 percent per dollar. And we’re doing it in an old, worn-out Kmart building, so I know it can be done,” Vinroot said.

He said he is “very, very disgusted” with accusations that charter schools filter for only the top-performing students.

“We’ve got 500 kids waiting on the doorstep trying to get into our school that has about 1,000 students in it now, because the parents understand we’ve done a better job,” Vinroot said.

Senate Education Committee members Gladys Robinson, D-Guilford, Angela Bryant, D-Nash, and Don Davis, D-Greene, and House Education Committee vice chairwoman Tricia Cotham, D-Mecklenburg, who are frequent critics of charter schools, did not respond to requests for comment.

Dan Way is an associate editor of Carolina Journal

Posted in Education - K-12, Learning and Education, Politics - NC | Leave a comment

Charter school company refuses to disclose salaries. REALLY?

Print media company refuses to use brain.

PR – 2014 06 10 re Starnews article

Posted in Education - K-12, Learning and Education, Politics, Politics - NC | Leave a comment

Transparency – What you may not know…

Governments by Open Records: The original purpose of transparency through Open Meetings and Public Records and LEA salary disclosures is that these laws applied to the governments which made the rules and controlled the public’s money– the governments, whether state (the legislature and executive branch and DPI), county, or city.  These entities needed transparency in their operations so the public could see what was going on between elections and adjust their votes accordingly.  The people in the voting booths were the only check or balance on these government entities.  Oversight of government rests with an informed public who elects the government, and who have no choices, otherwise.

Corporations by Contracts: The need for transparency as it may apply to private corporations is quite different.  The government has the discretion to make contracts or award grants to private corporations to accomplish certain ends. The government retains the right, through its contracts or grants to terminate the contract or cancel the grant if the ends envisioned are not being achieved. The need for transparency  is superfluous.  Oversight of contracts and grants rests with the government which issues these contracts and grants and which has many choices for promoting its ends.

Continue reading

Posted in Education - K-12, Politics, Politics - NC, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Memorial Day

(left) Capt. Mitchell Johnston, VF-16 Navy F6F ACE on the Hornet. Flew with Butch O’Hare,

Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Some Media Slow to Report Facts…

[This comment was posted in response to a WECT May 20th article berating Charter Day School, RBA, and me for being slow to WECT's demand for a list of all teachers' salaries - personal information that we believe is private, confidential information between the school and the teacher.]

Since June of 2011, WECT has reported nineteen articles about Charter Day School, The Roger Bacon Academy (RBA) or Baker Mitchell. Most of them attempt to cast these successful Charter School educators in a negative light with little or no positive news. For example:

1. It failed to report Charter Day School in Leland, managed by RBA, had the highest combined test scores and academic growth of any public school in Brunswick County.  Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Charter schools need to tell taxpayers what they’re getting for their money!

What is the Tax Payer Getting? Much more.

“Charter schools need to tell taxpayers what they are getting for their money.” The headline is from the March 24 StarNews editorial. As a founder of local charter schools, I agree 100 percent; surely everyone agrees that taxpayers should know what they are getting for their money.  And they are getting much more for their money. Continue reading

Posted in Education - K-12, Learning and Education, Politics - NC | 1 Comment

21st Century Globally Competitive – Late to the Party?

Edville, USA – The hue and cry for our schools to produce students who are “21st Century Globally Competitive” now stretches from sea to shining sea across our great nation. Continue reading

Posted in Education - K-12, Learning and Education, Politics - NC, Politics - US, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Salaries, salaries, Who’s got the salaries?

Although charter schools are subjected to the same accounting standards and annual auditing that govern traditional schools, they are not required to invade the privacy of their employees by publishing their salaries. Continue reading

Posted in Education - K-12, Learning and Education, Politics, Politics - NC | 1 Comment

Grading Children at a Play

Grading Children at a Play
(with apologies to Robert Frost)

Whose son this is I think I know,
His mom is in the lockup, though.
She will not see me judging here
To watch her boy’s skit win the show. Continue reading

Posted in Education - K-12, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Winter Solstice of Frost – The Darkest Evening

Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening

Whose woods these are I think I know.
His house is in the village, though;
He will not see me stopping here
To watch his woods fill up with snow. Continue reading

Posted in Religion | Leave a comment